Recipe

“Eat More Wheat & Less Rice” Campaign in 60s Singapore (Include Recipes from the Campaign)

Singapore Blogs AwardWe are nominated for Singapore Blog Awards. Vote for us if you like what we have been doing! You can vote everyday. In order to fulfill one of the judging criteria, we have to write something about the 60s, the theme for the Awards.

Why “Eat More Wheat” Campaign?

The 60s was a turbulent time for Singapore. We just separated from Malaysia. There were racial riots and even a bombing. Just “a small red dot” with no natural resources, we needed to fight for our survival or sink. Started from 1967, the “Eat More Wheat” campaign was part of the government’s aim for Singapore to be self-sufficient in food production. There were plans to build multi-storey buildings to house livestock and farmers were encouraged to grow crops that yield 11 to 13 times a year.1 This means growing rice, which require much land and time, was out of the question.

Besides self-sufficiency, the other reason is economy. In the late 60s, there was a communist uprising in Thailand, which caused the price of rice to soar. If people ate more wheat and less imported rice, Dr Goh Keng Swee, then-Finance Minister, estimated that Singapore would save $22 million a year and at the same time, create jobs in local flour mills.2 In a time when a bowl of noodles cost 5 cents, $22 million was astronomical. Not only was eating more wheat beneficial to the country economically, it could make us less dependent on imported rice.

One last reason why flour/wheat was encouraged was because it fits across all races. It can be made into bread, noodles, and chappatis.

Eat More Wheat Ad
Eat More Wheat Ad in Straits Times, 1969. From National Library

How the Campaign Was Carried Out

Eat More Wheat Campaign - Toh Chin Chye
Deputy Prime Minster Toh Chin Chye (Right) Tasting a Wheat Cooking Competition. From National Archives Singapore

Then-Deputy Prime Minster Toh Chin Chye personally spearheaded the campaign. Although his name was Chin Chye, he didn’t chin chye, chin chye handle the campaign. Jingles were played on air. Posters of a chubby boy eating noodles were plastered along streets. (Yeah, models used to be plump. Fat is beautiful.) A flour exhibition was held in conjunction with National Day ’67.3 The Singapore Food Manufacturers’ Association organized a “Eat More Flour Week” in liaison with the government.4 The Singapore Medical Association endorsed the campaign publicly, citing health benefits of flour over rice in Straits Times.5

eat more wheat campaign
Secondary School Winners of One of the Many Wheat Cooking Contests. From National Archives Singapore

The campaign’s primary targets were aimed at women and blue collared workers. For the workers, organizations such as Port of Singapore Authority distributed bread instead of rice for the port workers’ free meals.6 The National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) urged “workers and their families to have at least a lunch or dinner of wheat products.”7 Obviously, there was elitism going on that needs to be explored further.

It should come as no surprise that the other primary target was women, because they were in charge of the household nutrition in the 60s. The Siglap Women’s Association held wheat exhibition.8 There were numerous cooking competitions using wheat as a main ingredient, targeting women. For instance, a Cooking with Wheat competition was held for housewives on TV and radio, which drew 1000 over entries of recipes.9

Eat More Wheat Cooking Contest
Officer Chang Heng Wan, Navel Cook, Winner of Baking Contest. From National Library

But when three men won the top places in a cake-baking contest organized by Madam Chan Choy Siong, MP for Delta and chairperson for People’s Association of Women, the shame “made the ladies blush.”10 The message was quite clear that although women were the main targets for the campaign, men could contribute to the cause. Like targeting workers, targeting women showed a gender inequality that can be explored further.

Why Eat More Wheat Campaign Failed Miserably

A survey was done six months after “Eat More Wheat” Campaign was launched and only 1.8% of the 900 households across all races started to consume wheat. The campaign was an epic fail because of these reasons:

a. Cost: Although then-deputy Prime Minster Toh Chin Chye claimed out that flour cost about half the price of rice11, it was not true. For instance, a reader of Straits Times wrote that it was more costly to buy bread than rice and the wheat cooking competitions were a waste of time.12 MP S. V. Lingam was against the campaign, stating in parliament that the workers couldn’t afford wheat because breakfasting at $2 was worth a family’s meals for the entire day.13 The irony of the campaign was that while it was aimed at blue-collared workers, only the rich could afford to eat wheat.

Another cost-related reason is that rice doesn’t need any extra ingredients. People in the past just ate rice with soya sauce or salted fish. But for flour, you need more ingredients to make it palatable, and more ingredients mean more money, which Singaporean workers could not afford.

RESIDENTS AT THE WHEAT EXHIBITION OPENED BY MINISTER FOR CULTURE & SOCIAL AFFAIRS OTHMAN BIN WOK AT SIGLAP COMMUNITY CENTRE
Residents at Wheat Exhibition Featuring Food of All Races at Siglap Community Centre. From National Archives SIngapore

b. Labor: Cooking rice is easy, but baking flour to bread or rolling them to noodles take time and effort, and time and effort were something the working class did not have.

c. Culture: Asians eat rice. When Chinese greet each other, we don’t say, “How are you?” We say, “Have you eaten rice?” Old habits die hard. Culture trumps campaign.

In conclusion, the “Eat More Wheat” campaign shows the complex web of race, gender, culture, social class, economy, education, media, politics, medical power, and nationality with a simple ingredient as wheat.

Recipes from “Eat More Wheat” Campaign

These recipes are taken from Straits Times 10 Sep 1967.

Banana Pancake

IMG_9272aIngredients
4 tbsp ground oats
1 cup thick coconut milk
2 tbsp condensed milk
2 eggs, well-beaten
2 tbsp butter
4 tbsp flour
1.5 mashed banana
1 tbsp full-cream milk
salt & sugar to taste

METHOD
1. Mix all the above ingredients.
2. Heat frying pan and grease it.
3. Pour in mixture to form a 6cm pancake in diameter.

Star Cake

Ingredients
10 eggs (8 egg whites, 10 yolks)
10oz butter
9.5oz sugar
2 tsp baking powder
4.5oz ground oats
2 tbsp vanilla essence
2 tsp condensed milk
5.5oz self-raising flour

METHOD
1. Cream butter for 25 minutes.
2. Add condensed milk and vanilla essence and beat for another 10 minutes.
3. Beat 10 yolks for 20 minutes and add sugar. Beat till sugar dissolves.
4. Whisk 3 egg-whites till stiff in another bowl.
5. Sieve oats and flour with baking powder.
6. Oil cake tin with margarine or butter; and oil the paper lining cake tin.
7. Preheat oven at 375 degrees for 20 minutes. Bake cake in oven till cooked.

Coconut-Egg Porridge

Ingredients
3 pandan leaves
0.5 cup oats
3 tsp sugar
2.5 cups water
1 cup undiluted coconut milk
1 egg

METHOD:
1. Place pandan leaves, oats, salt, and water into pot. Stir over heat till thickens and boils.
2. Add sugar and let it boil for another 5 minutes.
3. Add coconut milk and bring to boil.
4. Remove pandan leaves and add beaten egg. Stir occasionally till porridge boils.

References
1. “Getting on Top of the Food Fight Down on the Farm.” Straits Times. 20 Aug 1967. p. 8.
2. “Rice VS Flour.” Straits Times. 9 Sep 1967. p. 6.
3. “All Set For S’pore’s Day of Joy.” Straits Times. 7 Aug 1967. p. 13.
4. “‘Eat More Flour Week’ in S’pore Next Month.” Straits Times. 21 Aug 1967. p. 9.
5. “Doctors Back Eat More Wheat Campaign.” Straits Times. 2 Nov 1967. p. 5.; “Eating More Wheat Instead of Rice May Save Your Live.” Straits Times. 5 Nov 1967. p. 2.
6. “It’s Bread Instead of Rice for Dockers.” Straits Times. 26 Sep 1967. p. 5.
7. “Start ‘Eat Less Rice’ Campaign Plea by NTUC.” Straits Times. 27 Jun 1967. p. 9.
8. “Wheat Food Display by Women.” Straits Times. 26 Jul 1967. p. 4.
9. “Cooking with Wheat: Radio, TV Contest for Housewives.” Straits Times. 24 Aug 1968. p. 6; “Over 1,000 Entries for Flour Dishes Contest.” Straits Times. 29 Sep 1967. p. 8; “Cookery Contest ‘A Gourmet’s Delight.'” Straits Times. 6 Aug 1968. p. 14.
10. “Petty Officer Chang Takes the Cake.” Straits Times. 30 Mar 1969. p. 8.
11. Straits Times. 26 Jun 1967.
12. “Eating More Wheat But Cheaply.” Straits Times. 20 Jan 1968. p. 16.
13. “Eat Wheat Drive Aimed At Rich.” Straits Times. 20 Dec 1967. p. 6.

Written by

Categories: Recipe

16 replies »

  1. Love this article!! Where do you even get all these information? I can’t imagine the average person in the 60s eating Banana Pancake and Starcake! BTW did you know that Prima Flour Mills is still one of the largest flour mills in Asia?

    Like

    • Lots of research. I even went down to National Archives to find the posters but they didn’t have it. A wasted trip.

      Yes! The recipes are super interesting. Like the coconut-egg porridge. No rice was used as the ingredients. The name of the dish was to “trick” people into cooking it and substituting it for real porridge.

      I didn’t know about Prima. That’s interesting to know they are still doing so well.

      Like

    • Hello, it does seem implausible the noodles were so cheap, given that it costs $3.50 now. But my information is accurate. A small bowl of noodles without any ingredients could cost 5 cents, and a big bowl cost 10 cents in the 60s Singapore. I asked my grandmother about this. A bit of oral history from my grandmother.

      You can also check out this blog and see “Victor Khoo’s comment” which he stated that a bowl of noodles cost 5 cent.

      Like

  2. Well, I can personally vouch the accuracy of a bowl of noodles for 5 cents in the late 60s. I would have been in about Primary 3, and “graduated” then from 5 cents to 10 cents for my daily ration of pocket money. At the school tuckshop, I would always save 5 cents and with the remaining 5 cents, bought a bowl of noodles, usually in soup and with a few slices of fishcake, for the princely sum of .. yes, 5 cents! Then down it with a tumbler of plain water I brought from home. Oh, what sweet reminiscing!

    Thank you so much for this piece of writing, Nathanael! Wonderful effort with your research! And most of all, for bringing back to me memories of my own youth in 60s and 70s Singapore! Keep up your good work!

    PS – Errr .. is it too late to vote?

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.